Thanks to NMM.org here is a beautiful comparison chart of the look of the main characters from Catherine Hardwicke directed Twilight (1st, 3rd column) and Chris Weitz directed New Moon (2nd, 4th column). The differences are stunning when you see them side by side. Here at TB.net we are digging the Chris Weitz take on the characters, however, Twilight still brought the goods to the table. Your vote Twis?
{via NMM.org}
Sorry to say but i think the new director just isnt doing the better job. They should never have let Cathrine Hardwick go. I mean, Edward doesnt even look like Edward anymore!
ReplyDeleteok they r not doin a good job 4 the characters i mean lik esme carlisle and alice look evil now....edward is sooo not as hot and it looks lik rosalie is wearin a wig and jazz looks lik he just got out of bed cause his eyes hav bags under them...they really shouldnt hav let Catherine go i mean seriously!!!!
ReplyDeleteI like the new looks MUCH better. They all looked creepy before.
ReplyDeletethey dont look lik vampires any mor......their 2 tan now they should b whiter lik a vampire
ReplyDeleteVictoria looks more like she was described in the books, her hair a more fiery red now instead of so orange-y. Laurent looks like he spent time with the Denalis because he looks slightly more peaceful, although he has the red eyes. Esme has the more rounded face now as she had in the books, Bella looks older which goes along with her desire to become a vamp, Edward looks more like a person and not the monster he thinks he is, Jacob looks perfect, older and muscular, I wish Alice's hair had stayed the same pixie-ish cut as in Twilight, Rosalie has the I am gorgeous attitude from the books, Jasper ooks more like a vamp now than before, Emmett still looks the same and Carlisle looks more like a doctor now and less like a vamp. I think it's great!!
ReplyDeleteI think new moon is going to be 10 times better. I love all the books but I think Chris Weitz is following the book better. The characters seem more like how they sounded from the book now.
ReplyDeleteI love it! especially Jacob and Edward.
some of them look good and some dont. i like alices hair better the other way.
ReplyDeleteI think the old images looks more like the characters in the book, but the new pictures looks more dangerous
ReplyDeleteFor your attention i like 50: 50
ReplyDelete- I like the Old Victoria
- I like the Old Esme Cullen
- I like the Old Laurent
- I like the Old Bella
- I like the old Edward ( obvious)!
- I like the New Jacob
- I like the old Alice ( Duh! She looks weird)-> the new one
- I Like the old rosalie
- I like the old Jasper
- I like the Old Emmett
- I like the new carlisle...
Is it still the same artist?
I like all the new one except alice! I dont like the new hair!
ReplyDeleteWhile I like the colour treatments on the new photographs, and I don't have any issues with Alice's hair, I think they've nailed her dress style even more too. I don't like the way the photographer shot them. Rosalie looks horrible in the new shot, Jacob looks all t-shirt with the top of his head cut off.
ReplyDeleteWhile Victoria's new hair is more the colour it says in the book, to change it seems odd - why would a vampire dye her hair? And though I love the new cut of Esme - vampires hair doesn't grow, so it better not be long again for Eclipse!!
The only thing I don't like about the new photos is the red eye-liner on the vamps.
I really liked the movie Twilight. The story, and the actors...it's like they were chosen especially for teenagers.
ReplyDeleteI think chris is doing a much better job than cathrine hardwicke did. The way he created the characters mathes much better to the way i imagined them when reading the books.
ReplyDeleteSo much better! They actually look real!
ReplyDeleteI think some of them looked better in Twilight, but Viktoria and Jacob look better in New Moon...
ReplyDeletetbh, I think that most of the characters looked better in Twilight... as far as I can tell, it seems like they lost some of their "natural beauty" in New Moon.
ReplyDeleteCatherine Hardwicke did a SHITTY job. SHe RUINED Twilight. Off the bat, New Moon will be 100% better than THAT crap they tried to sell us with her in charge.
ReplyDeleteWowo i think they look much better. and for the person that said they look evil...well they are vampires.
ReplyDeleteand i think the first photos looked way to fake and dark these ones are still dark but there no big shadows and they look more realistic. like seriosly look at the photo of edward compared to the new moon one is a huge difference it actually looks like a real photo.
Oh and they didn't replace kathrine she didn't want to do new moon. she had her fun in twilight did a great job i think but her photo were dodgey.
Well, maybe I'm gonna wait 4 d' film.... to see who's better...
ReplyDeleteI love the new looks! Much more realistic and much more intimidating looking... I mean they are vampires! They're supposed to be scary! But still beautiful!
ReplyDeleteI think Twilight wins. When it's going to be included in the TV contents, the audience numbers will go very high, I'm sure!
ReplyDeleteAm I the only one that's legitimately dissapointed that they canged Jaspers hair? It looks terrible now.
ReplyDeletei will love both movies but i think this one looks creapier, which is wat the second book is! i love there looks tho... the only one i dont like too much is alices hair... its not pixie anymore... but they all look great to me.. i think the lil more color that they added really fits for pics so the movie should be great
ReplyDeleteThe new Alice looks just like Brook from One tree Hill!! Not some much like a Vampire!! And the old Rosalie and the old Emmett were better!!
ReplyDeleteTHEY LOOK MORE TANNED!!!
ReplyDeleteEdward doesnt look like Edward....
Bella looks like she has too much make-up on
and what the hell have they done to Alice's hair!??!
WTF?
but all the other characters look better
I really like the old looks. I mean, Bella looks to pretty, & with Make-Up to be an Average, Tom Boy!
ReplyDeleteI prefer the new ones but i dont think are white enough they all have a similar tan too jacob. Bella looks better and they are all a bit more edgy
ReplyDeletei think jacob is the only one that look nice the vamps look weird and evil. bella looks weird in the new moon pic soo i think twilight pics are better
ReplyDeleteI like Edward and Jasper in Twilight a lot better.
ReplyDeleteI think the new ones are MUCH better. edwaed looks much better in the new pictures, in the first there is too much shadowing used...
ReplyDeletebut its used on all of them, far too much.
The new ones show ore of the angst in rosalie and the pain in jaspers faces. Esme is much softer in her new one which is like her character. Robert is more controlled like his character not angry like the first one. Bella is prettier in the second, and seemingly more like a lamb. ;)
Alice is better too, more playful :)
I think Jacob and Emmett dont look better or worse.
And Carlisle looks better. :)
i like the old edward, victoria, jasper, and alice better. i mean alice would be fine but i cant get past the hair. the red eyeliner is too scary, and they r to tan! does alabaster mean anything???? the others i can live with just ditch the freaky eyeliner, but really, you dont see the cullen the whole movie like the first so the only one i would b worried about eclipse more. the twilight saga needs cathrine back badly.
ReplyDeleteCatherine botched the entire first movie. The characters look more like they are described in the books. I'm praying Chris doesn't screw up the 2nd movie as badly as Catherine did the 1st. So far, I am very excited to see New Moon.
ReplyDeleteI think that New Moon is going to be a lot better than Twilight... I think that is was a lot better made. I wish that the director of New Moon would have also done Twilight and the rest for that matter. The only thing I do not like is that I think they made Bella look to good for New Moon. She is not like you would picture her at all by reading the books.
ReplyDeletei like the new ones better, they are easier to see, like Laurent is liek hardly noticeable, and Jazz looked plain wierd before.
ReplyDeleteJacob looks better 2! Bella looks much older, and in the old one, she looked like 14! now she looks 18!
ReplyDeleteCathrine Hardwicke did a good job, But Chris is doing 200% better. I hope he directs Breaking Dawn too :)
ReplyDeleteIf you had the same photographer then you could compare.
ReplyDeleteI like the white on the vampires more than the tan. vamps don't like sunlight.
I like Alice's short hair.
SIX days and I can tell first hand. got tickets to the midnight show.
I like the new Edward but I think the pictures are taken by another photographer i mean it's not about the director. but, for me i like twilight more, no offense, new moon's good (i've watched it 4 times) but i think there's something about a girl director that makes it more "girly" or more good for me.
ReplyDeleteI like the new ones better, except their eyes.
ReplyDeletethe vampire eyes they have in the new movie are not as subtle as the old ones. other than that chris did a MUCH better job.
new moons gunna be better anyways..
less edward and more jacob ;]
I dont like how they are all so tan! Also, Rose and Esme just look way too different. Not that its bad, but vampires arent supposed to be able to change, and they did-big time. Everything else was good. Love Victorias new hair. Its more of the way I imagined. Team Edward
ReplyDeleteI think New moon is better except Esme(she looks not as cute as should be), Alice (the hair just doesn't fit) and Edward (he looks 2 old)
ReplyDelete